![]() ![]() Do you also disagree that this feature would add value to Joplin? ![]() This way things would stay the same for happy users, but people getting access to a repository of raw text markdown notes from a friend or colleague would have the option to use their safe and comfortable preferred Joplin to manage, review and edit those notes rather than having to use some other unfamiliar software because Joplin is missing the option to work directly on files. ![]() My actual point would be to have the option to have no metadata inside the note: The option to add a new "file based" notebook and specify its location. But I must emphasize this was a compromise to address the criticism of the criticism. This way things would stay the same for happy users, but the criticism from the person who started this thread would be addressed. I think it's acceptable to have notes editable outside of Joplin where metadata is visible, but inside Joplin the frontmatter would be hidden. You think it's acceptable to have metadata in files exposed to the user, and I think it's not, and indeed we'll have to agree to disagree on this one ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |